Bernds who like the ocean use
https://oceanhero.today/
Post math simulators
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/sl4ucvcaca
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/um2wwsev11
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/e9ti5bi2lr
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/eob3uhfplp
2 messages omitted.
Does ChatGPT pass the Turing test?
12 messages omitted.
the problem at the core is language isn't math.
math is a language, yes, but human language doesn't convert to pure math without mistakes.
another point is:
our current model is at it's theoretical maximum performance, when it hits the average/median of the training data; not better.
if you filter the training data heavily, you do not have a wide range of possible topics.
if you do not filter the training data, you have shit tier responses, because the average human is shit tier.
I think what "hallucination" means (at least from what I read) that when there is no data in the training set in it's "memory" then it comes up with something that likely exists irl.
The example is that it was referring to a package on github that didn't exist and listed as a dependency for some application (I think it was some aliexpress api stuff), but the name of the package he composed from relevant snippets, and it sounded likely such thing exist.
Thing is, these LLMs, chatbots, autocompletes, aren't occupied by giving an answer or checking facts, but by generating a text that sounds human, sounds believable.
>math is a language, yes, but human language doesn't convert to pure math without mistakes.
hmmm...I kinda agree, but because Math is perfect, not because language isn't. But math is just...Different kind of "perfect", it's almost divine and it replicates in the universe or quarks. "As above, so below", "Your kingdom come, your will be done".
>Theoretical maximum performance
I kind of understand what you say? there is no more room to improve AI with the CURRENT models, that's half true, we can still use this "AI Language" but do bigger datacenters, you will not have a ferrari but your car will be faster.
>aren't occupied by giving an answer or checking facts
it's relative because it depends on what outcome you want it to be. If I learn about programming and ask chatgpt "hey give me this code, hey this is a mistake, fix it, hey there is another mistake" he will just give you the code and generic text. But if you TALK to the AI and ask why something happen, it can actually teach you why something is like it is, and how can you do that.
Again, only with coding and programming, I didn't test it with anything else, but it's really good to teach how to develop your skills on coding.
I find the structure of bioballs to be quite beautiful in its complexity. Let this be the thread for similar discussions for protein structure, how they interact etc.
>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/herpes-kind-beautiful-molecular-level-180968714/
People with antisocial behaviour don't know what to make of compliments
"They did not seem to know as well what to do with the feedback and interpreted feedback as negative more quickly. Normally, people can distinguish quite well. If someone is nice, you act nice back. This group did not seem to want this or they just cannot make this distinction," van de Groep explains.
Young adults with higher levels of psychopathic traits thought more negatively about themselves, especially about how social they are towards others.
"Usually, research focuses on empathy tasks. But antisocial behaviour is not only related to how you view others, but also to how you see yourself."
https://www.eur.nl/en/news/people-antisocial-behaviour-dont-know-what-make-compliments
2 messages omitted.
>say thank you
Side thing, apparently people in Japan get offended if you say “thank you” after a compliment because apparently it makes you look full of yourself. Instead you supposed to deny the compliment like saying “no I’m not” or something. I don’t get that, why would you be mad if I showed gratitude for your existence? Unless it’s actually true, then why try to deny something good? It’s stupid, wouldn’t it be more narcissistic to keep the discussion about you instead of appreciating the other person and appreciating yourself?
Funny how life imitates mathematics. Welcome to the thread of pure mathematical autism.
8 messages omitted.
It’s like 12:00am and I thought of something no one else has apparently. Finding a kronecker product is pretty easy, I could find the product of two γ matrixes. However what if we add a layer of complexity and preform this function only in lambda calculus.
find the kronecker products of any two γ matrixes, only using lambda calculus
If matrix manipulation is possible, and you can compute any possible function into a lambda expression, than there must be an algorithm to make a kronecker product function in lambda calculus.
Note that this cannot be done in Python because kronecker products are not anonymous functions.
https://crypto.stanford.edu/~blynn/lambda/matrix.html
A few good friends of mine are getting COVID so I made this in honor of them. Let this be the thread discussion on COVID related topics, medical information, personal experiences, thoughts etc.
12 messages omitted.
