
Does anyone want to talk about religion, philosophy, literature, classical music, art and other shit on here? I can't stand the pedos anymore.


>>343953
damn
>>343785
I have heard of a simple but effective solution to at least the illegal imagery: whitelisted IPs.
Meaning, if an IP is not whitelisted or too new of a poster you can spoiler their images. The posts would still go through of course, but it wouldn't be so bad.
It's one simple solution if we absolutely need to hide the bad images.

>>343962
>pre-moderation format
Nein, part of what makes this place special is the lack of mod approved messages and freedom, I do not what Bernds to be limited.
The format the pedo bots use to s very predictable, I trolled people in this thread ( >>343303 ) because I got the order down. No one else types like that so it should be easy to filter them out.
>many higher than human beings.
Some of them like Greek gods are just to explain what we don’t know, when it comes to things like buddhism then that’s harder. But same principal still applies, that we can’t expect that we can think and other organisms can’t so we make things that represent concepts above us. God of war, lord of love, son of the moon, we made these things because we want something more than this existence, even I choose to believe of a world out of this one because it sounds right, despite me not having proof.
>What Aztecs and Mayans used what Spaniards could burn?
They used amate paper, and sometimes deer skin. amate is still being made in Mexico to this day.

>>343965
>damn
Honestly most old religious and Romanticism art is good.
>put a spoiler on their image
==HELL NO==
Let me show you what I’m working with ( >>343107 ) for me to put a spoiler on a thread I have to click the buttons, at that point just remove the CP instead of hiding it. I remember going to soy.party and seeing gore covered up, I thought how lazy must you be to not want a safe place for your soyjaks. I never want KC to be this lazy, +people like seeing what there not supposed to, I proved this in one of my earliest threads ( >>322388 ) it would be a terrible idea to do that, I just want them gone!