How do we solve the G*rman Problem?
Bernd
2025-01-08 20:43:08 ⋅ 2w
No. 331252
I like that pic, OP.
The answer is: Uralics has to take over the EU. Except Finlan and Estonia are as insane as Germany these days.
Bernd
2025-01-09 00:35:19 ⋅ 2w
No. 331263
Good question
Bernd
2025-01-09 01:13:18 ⋅ 2w
No. 331265
Germany should leave the EU so it can't dominate the EU like it did during Merkel's prime time. And tie the Deutsche Mark to the €, just like the Swiss did with their Franken.
Bernd
2025-01-09 02:24:36 ⋅ 2w
No. 331269
Europe is shit anyway. Cigsmokers can't handle each other
Bernd
2025-01-09 03:20:42 ⋅ 2w
No. 331272
The EU shouldn't be strong, or even exist
Bernd
2025-01-09 03:47:16 ⋅ 2w
No. 331273
>>331272
Well its a Cold War projekt. But they want sell it us as muhhh Free Trade.
Bernd
2025-01-09 19:18:11 ⋅ 1w
No. 331337
>>331272
>>331273
EU is kinda inevitable.
All the nations in the EU have this paradoxical notion of aspiring to be an empire while preserving a high sense of individualism. It's paradoxical because empires are typically multi-national, multi-ethnic. This notion comes from antiquity, as with so many other things, we inherited if from Greece and Rome.
Up to the middle of the last century, the empire was initiated unilaterally, one of the nations tried to conquer the rest. The EU however is a cooperative effort. More or less.
Anyway to fix the EU, the EU needs cheap resources, first and foremost cheap energy. "Renewables" **how windmills and solar panels "renew" btw? are they grow on trees?** aren't cheap. It's either gas or uranium. Nor the US neither the Arabs are cheap source. It's either Russia or Africa. Both has problems which needs to be solved.
The decision is: either make peace with Russia or unfuck Libya and the Sahel.
While this is getting solved have to severe ties with the US, have to become independent. First and foremost Europe have to be able to "defend" itself. Europe needs an army, and larger nuclear arsenal.
Lotsa money into arms production. Lotsa investments are good for the economy. It's an indirect investment into everything else, since arms manufacturers don't just sit on the moneybags but they spend it.
So: get cheap gas and uranium, and build a large army (perhaps as small as 500K troops would be enough). With navy and air force ofc.
Bernd
2025-01-09 21:26:06 ⋅ 1w
No. 331363
Eu will be naturally strong with time, no?
Prussia went from zollverein to Germany with time.
Bernd
2025-01-09 22:09:45 ⋅ 1w
No. 331368
>>331337
> Both has problems which needs to be solved.
How?
Bernd
2025-01-10 13:40:16 ⋅ 1w
No. 331416
>>331363
OR
did Prussia in fcat get partioned between Poland and the HRE with time?
Bernd
2025-01-10 19:44:49 ⋅ 1w
No. 331452
>>331368
I'm not authorized to share the Hungarian world domination plans, sorry.
Bernd
2025-01-12 10:12:48 ⋅ 1w
No. 331566
>>331337
>empires are typically multi-national, multi-ethnic
No, that's how empires dying.
>have to severe ties with the US, have to become independent
EU can't severe ties with USA. Too much to lose.
>The decision is: either make peace with Russia or unfuck Libya and the Sahel.
EU will fuck Russia instead.
>First and foremost Europe have to be able to "defend" itself.
Yes, "defend".
>Europe needs an army, and larger nuclear arsenal.
Already has both. The first one is called NATO the second is France (UK while not in EU anymore will gladly help to fuck Russia and it has nukes too)
Bernd
2025-01-12 11:17:06 ⋅ 1w
No. 331568
>>331566
An Empire is by definition a dominion that is multinational
Bernd
2025-01-12 11:48:18 ⋅ 1w
No. 331569
>>331568
Don't tell me you can't see the difference between a Union and Empire?
It would be funny to argue with Egyptians, Romans or Mongolians about multikulti, right until they enslave and whip you. Equally fun could be to impress Victorian British with such concept. Than they tie you to a cannon or starve to death.
Bernd
2025-01-12 11:59:18 ⋅ 1w
No. 331571
"Empire" doesnt imply that the constituent nations have joined it voluntary
Bernd
2025-01-12 12:11:39 ⋅ 1w
No. 331572
>>331571
First of all it may destroy their nations or do not recognize them as nations or human beings at all. Examples - any European empire during colonial era or any ancient empire until the end of Rome (which ended exactly because late Roman leadership recognized former colonial subjects as legitimate citizens). Consequently any modern European power will cease to exist if immigration won't stop same way as it was over for Rome.
Bernd
2025-01-12 16:40:50 ⋅ 1w
No. 331580
>>331571
Where did you read that?
Bernd
2025-01-13 11:30:12 ⋅ 1w
No. 331690
>>331580
that is self evident
Bernd
2025-01-13 12:54:06 ⋅ 1w
No. 331693
>>331690
It's dont.
Bernd
2025-01-13 16:08:40 ⋅ 1w
No. 331695
>>331690
In Russian empire joining is voluntary. The Kremlin volunteers to join you.
Bernd
2025-01-13 19:13:35 ⋅ 1w
No. 331719
>>331695
Turn on TV, greenland is about to "willingly" join burgerstadian empire.
Bernd
2025-01-14 18:11:12 ⋅ 1w
No. 331834
>>331719
Greenland isn't the only one being liberated...
Bernd
2025-01-14 18:53:41 ⋅ 1w
No. 331835
Boomers still have a strong emotional bond to their small states, the school propaganda they were subjected to was really effective. We have to wait until they're weak and powerless. After that we can Bild our strong european republic that will adequately serve the needs of the great european nation.
Bernd
2025-01-14 20:37:07 ⋅ 1w
No. 331838
>>331835
>t. outsider
Bernd
2025-01-15 02:22:39 ⋅ 1w
No. 331845
>>331363
Prussia had strong and competent leadership. The eu doesnt and is infested with if not led by american clients
Consider that european strategic assets (greenland, as said earlier) are openly being discussed as potential new territories for an imperial rival that castrated hogs see as an ally - europe says nothing and gives no strong response or support for denmark. Eu is a joke, that is why russia moves into its natural 'backyard.'
Bernd
2025-01-15 09:54:19 ⋅ 1w
No. 331863
>>331845
In general I can agree on what you wrote. But.
>european strategic assets (greenland
Greenland is not owned by Europe or the EU. It's own by Denmark. It is not a European or EU asset, it's a Danish asset. Denmark can do whatever she wants with it, she could sell it even - how'd they do this is up for Denmark. If the US used military force, they'd violate Denmark's sovereign borders. I'm not saying here the US is beyond violating sovereign borders of a country/state, she proved that in the past she's capable doing that.
EU is not a state. It has nothing like a state has. EU is a international/supranational organization. It has agreements. Paper and words all the assets the EU has.