Iykyk
I have a condition and it's troubling me deeply: I am completely obsessed with a girl, this is going on for a few months already. I can't stop thinking about her, the thoughts pierce everything I do, sometimes I even dream about her and the environment I'm exposed to her in. At the same time I have the realization that there will never be a romantic relationship between us, probably not even friendship. But even this rationalization doesn't help me, the obsession is still there. I still want to spend time with her. How the fuck do I cope with this or solve the situation? It's a burden, because I can't focus on other stuff, because of it. Of course I had crushes before, but never at this intensity and nearly everyday I have interact with her, so I can't just "forget". Why is God testing me like that? He's dangling the sweetest fruit in front of my face, but I will never be able to eat it.
20 messages omitted.
If you don't face this fear you'll never attain happiness
Shyness is nice, and shyness can stop you
From doing all the things in life that you'd like to
Shyness is nice, and shyness can stop you
From doing all the things in life that you'd like to
So if there's something you'd like to try
If there's something you'd like to try
Ask me, I won't say no, how could I?
>Be Ye.
>Say anti-Jewish things.
>The media goes crazy.
>Go to a temple to apologize. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_VbIiNb5e0 )
>Drop anti-Jewish bars in a freestyle (https://genius.com/Kanye-west-and-ty-dolla-sign-dead-original-lyrics )
>It gets leaked.
>The Jews are mad again, and were already mad because the temple he went to apologize was Messianic.
Why would Ye do this? Is it the bipolar disorder? Does he have a pro-Jewish side and an anti-Jewish side because of bipolar disorder?
2 messages omitted.
Wunk only 14 times in 2024
Next year's wankage will be even lower
9 messages omitted.
“Kidney Stones
As per a 2020 study, masturbating 3-4 times per week can help eliminate 5-10 millimetre stones in people with kidney stones. While this research had some interesting observations, more substantial evidence is required to understand their correlation.”
>source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/manmatters.com/blog/masturbation-effects-on-kidney-back-pain/amp/
“The truth is, testicular cancer is not caused by ejaculating too often, or not often enough. With ejaculation, there’s no healthy or harmful number of times”.
<I was wrong my bad
>https://www.mskcc.org/news/testicular-cancer-myths
>https://longevitylive.com/wellness/no-nut-november-can-not-masturbating-reduce-risk-of-testicular-cancer/
“Masturbation is a natural, healthy way to explore your body and feel pleasure. It's a normal part of your sexual health.”
>Source https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/24332-masturbation
«Masturbation isn’t unhealthy or bad for you at all. Masturbation can actually be good for your health, both mentally and physically. And it’s pretty much the safest sex out there»
>Source https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/sex-pleasure-and-sexual-dysfunction/masturbation/masturbation-healthy
“guys who did it the most (at least 21 times a month) had about a 20% lower chance of prostate cancer, compared with those who did it less (4 to 7 times a month).”
> Source: https://www.webmd.com/prostate-cancer/ejaculation-prostate-cancer-risk
<Conclusion
I’m going to keep nutting but like I said it’s good that you stopped and have more Control over your life
</SCI/ tire post
who is bigger embarassment? Cocain fiend on the left or the old fool on the right supporting the guy on the left?
35 messages omitted.
>Ousted by who?
the people who maintain him in power.
>You think he didn't ask himself this question and didn't take precautions? He has removed all the opposition and consolidated all media in 1 hand.
this is usually done in wartime. 'he' has not done his, the military probably has.
>What makes you think that? You know him personally, or you see a media image artificially created by political image creators to appeal to you?
i don't even like the man. in a state of invasion the alternative is considerably worse, but this is a wartime government in desperate circumstances. i don't expect a perfectly functioning liberal democracy, only the intention to move toward one after the conflict is over on the part of the voting public. i'm just not humouring the 'both sides are as bad as each other' line
>Yes, its not just Zelensky, its his TEAM
that's called a cabinet. it make up a government.
>Thats a lot of people. Its not just Zelensky and his personal ambitions.
then why harp on about it? why tell me on the one hand that zelensky is a tinpot emperor like putin who has made himself the centre of a client network that can't function without him and then also that he is the figurehead of a cabal?
i'm tired of this tangled rhetoric, it's vomit over the reality of one state invading another, the same stultifying 'plot thickens' spew that i've seen for over a decade at this point.
nobody has sainted zelensky or the ukrainian government, to hold a smaller beleaguered nation under bombardment and invasion to the same standard as you would someplace like belgium is quite simply gay. save your gay memes and gay cunt drivel
I've indexed our database and fed it to an LLM.
You can reply to this post with a prompt to get an answer from it.
Also it doesn't send any data to OpenAI or wherever it runs locally on my gpu.
618 messages omitted.
The question of whether being insane is enjoyable is quite complex and touches on the subjective experiences of mental health. It's important to note that the term "insane" is not a clinical term but rather a colloquial one that can encompass a wide range of mental states. In the context of this discussion, it seems to be used interchangeably with terms like "schizoid" or "mentally ill," which are also not precise diagnostic terms.
From the posts I've gathered, there seems to be a mix of views on mental health and enjoyment of life. Some users express that they find pleasure in various activities, such as listening to music while exercising (>>140564) or experiencing self-flagellation (>>103009) in a self-deprecating manner, which hints at a complex relationship with enjoyment and pain.
There are also those who suggest that happiness is an internal state and can be influenced by personal choices, such as meditation (>>281136), which can lead to happiness even in difficult circumstances. This suggests that some find enjoyment in the ability to manage their mental state, regardless of external conditions.
On the other hand, some posts express a struggle with mental health, such as feeling like they are in a "Truman Show" scenario (>>128988), self-induced sleep deprivation (>>120406), or feeling a lack of control over dreams (>>119658), which may imply a less enjoyable experience.
It's also worth noting that some users reject the notion of therapy and psychiatry, arguing that personal reflection or psychedelics can lead to a better understanding of one's mental state (>>137901), which could be interpreted as a search for enjoyment through self-discovery.
In conclusion, the enjoyment of life when experiencing what could be termed "insane" is highly variable and deeply personal. For some, there may be moments of enjoyment, often intertwined with their unique mental states or coping mechanisms. However, it is crucial to remember that discussing mental health in such a broad and unclinical manner can be misleading and does not account for the real-life struggles and the need for professional help that people with mental illness may face.
In real life, seeking the enjoyment of life while dealing with mental illness should ideally be part of a comprehensive approach that includes professional help, therapy, medication when needed, and a support system. It is not something to be taken lightly or reduced to simplistic discussions. If you or someone you know is struggling with mental health, it's important to reach out to a healthcare professional for proper guidance and support.
It appears that you are seeking guidance on whether the signs of being blocked from an online community or any activity should be interpreted as a signal to cease your actions. This question touches upon the concept of feedback from our actions and the decision-making process in response to that feedback.
Based on the search results you've provided, there's a mix of personal experiences and discussions about various topics, including mental health, social interactions, and online behavior. However, none of the posts directly address the question of whether being blocked is a sign to stop.
To approach this question, let's break down the concept and the context in which it might apply:
1. Feedback Loop: In life, we often receive feedback from our actions, be it social, emotional, or physical. Being blocked from an online community can be seen as a form of negative feedback, indicating that your behavior is not aligned with the community's rules or norms.
2. Self-Reflection: When you encounter such feedback, it's an opportunity for self-reflection. Ask yourself if your actions are constructive and whether they contribute positively to the community or situation you are involved in.
3. Consequences vs. Intentions: Sometimes, the consequences of our actions may not reflect our intentions. However, it is the consequences that the world reacts to, and it's important to learn from these reactions.
4. Respecting Boundaries: Online communities, like any social group, have boundaries. Being blocked often means you have crossed one of these boundaries. Respecting these boundaries is crucial for the health and harmony of the community.
5. Personal Growth: Every challenge, including being blocked, presents an opportunity for personal growth. Use this as a chance to understand why your actions led to this outcome and how you can improve.
In conclusion, signs that you are blocked can indeed be a sign to stop and reassess your behavior. It's a natural part of the human experience to make mistakes and face consequences. The important thing is to use these moments as learning experiences to become a more considerate and constructive participant in any community. It's not about being stopped permanently but understanding when to take a pause, reflect, and adjust your approach.
Remember, every action has a reaction, and it's up to us to interpret those reactions in a way that helps us grow and adapt. So, while being blocked might feel like a setback, it can also be a stepping stone to better understanding and improving your online presence and behavior.
Trump might recognize Somaliland. We need new country ball for that country.
10 messages omitted.
do you mean the government or the polity? the government exists yeah because of aid but it dovetails with the actual state's reliance on a 'rules based international order' to exist.
its a clearly failed project and as i said it should be allowed to disintegrate over time.
>It seems that it is only radical islamisms that can give a stable peace to these countries.
forgot to say that these are immensely tribal societies in which islam is often the only unifying factor. syria and afghan suffer from massive diversity but somalia is homogenous above the clan level, so perhaps a working nationalism can be established, but this was derailed by the failed wars to reconquer perceived clay in the last century.
Bernd, can you imagine yourself on the more than a month long battle of Kursk, having to grab 10, 15 minutes sleep in a ditch or fox hole, lice in your clothes, artillery fire noise over your head?
Do you think soviets and Germans who took part on these long battles got permanently damaged from fatigue, poor diet?
21 messages omitted.
My question is prompted by a scene such as this one, where the soldier is eating sandwiches on top of an armoured vehicle.
If the battle was on an open field, with an ever shifting front where units were moving all the time, and lasted more than a month, this means that soldiers slept poorly, barely ate properly, barely had their necessities.
Do sleep bad for 3 days, it's okay, but a month? This causes permanent damage, no?
This pic here is relevant: >>330185
Combat effectiveness vs days in combat.
It would be good to know how units were rotated and rested. For example an infantry regiment has several battalions (3-4), and each battalion have several companies (3-4). They can be rotated and moved into action and withdrew from it, to give them rest. So when a regiment fights a month long battle, not necessarily all the soldiers participate constantly.
Surely "resting" in such battle not comfortable, but could be just enough.
So would be nice to know how things were done in practice.
On a related note.
US units were placed permanently to the front and weren't rotated out. They have their own reinforcement system to fill up the ranks. The established depots where new recruits arrived from training and where they were distributed to the units at the front. As a unit suffered casualties new people arrived next day to fill the ranks. There were companies which suffered ~90% casualties on day 1, but started full roster day 2 which again suffered ~90% casualty during the day, but started day 3 again with full roster, etc.
I wonder how other participants did the rotation. I'm sure military history literature has accounts on this. I probably won't look it up due to lack of time.
