thanks, will be worth a try.
syne the threda has been answered, what are bernd's thoughts on death and legacy? i am not much of an individualist, i believe that, whatever we are, we live beyond death in our works, at least in the sense that our blood and bones, hair and skin cells are 'us' even when we can't feel them or they are alienated from us.
by extension, there cannot really be a separation between a man and those things he has affected or even made in this world, and that is the problem with the slippers. if i were to destroy them, i would surely be killing him again in a lesser way.
you might say 'but sneeter, that reasoning is insane and retarded. if you destroy the slippers, then the fibers and the fumes from their destruction would be a remnant of the man who once wore them, the bangladeshi slave who made them, the corrupt garkh who had them made in the first place.' true, but it is the consciousness of legacy in the minds of men that makes it such, its only our awareness that distinguishes one thing from a generality of faceless objects, none of which bear any weight on us. and are we not, as the soy anthem says, the ruler of everything?
is this sensible? if not, then i should very much like someone to tell me why, because its a paralysing way of thingking.